Cabbage plant (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) quantification culti-vated under different soil covers using aerial photographs

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Samuel U. Samaniego-Gamez
Moises Yáñez-Juárez
Fidel Núñez-Ramírez
María A. Payán-Arzapalo
Raúl E. Valle-Gough
Blancka Y. Samaniego-Gamez

Keywords

Precision agriculture, Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS), drone, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV).

Resumen

var. capitata L.) quantification cultivated under different types of mulching, using aerial images captured by RPAS (Remotely Piloted Aircraft System).


Design/methodology/approach: The cabbage plantation used for the study was established under a completely randomized block design with different types of mulch as treatments: black plastic, white plastic, straw, and bare soil. Manual plant counts and automated estimates were performed using two agricultural artificial intelligence platforms (Platforms A and B). The relationship was evaluated using linear regression correlation (R²), and the following indicators were subsequently used: estimation accuracy (Ps), estimation error percentage (Es), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE).


Results: Platform A showed a correlation coefficient range of R²=0.41 to 0.91. Platform B obtained R² values ranging from 0.77 to 0.88. Platform A exhibited the highest estimation accuracy (Ps) with 98.3% and an estimation error (Es) of -1.7% for straw mulch, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.0% and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1 for bare soil. Both platforms showed underestimations in the number of detected plants, ranging from -6.7% to -1.7%.


Limitations on study/implications: The use of RPAS was limited by atmospheric conditions such as wind and rain.


Findings/conclusions: The effectiveness of counting cabbage plants using RPAS was validated.

Abstract 49 | EARLY ACCESS 7 Downloads 0

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a