Cabbage plant (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) quantification culti-vated under different soil covers using aerial photographs

Main Article Content

Samuel U. Samaniego-Gamez
Moises Yáñez-Juárez
Fidel Núñez-Ramírez
María A. Payán-Arzapalo
Raúl E. Valle-Gough
Blancka Y. Samaniego-Gamez

Keywords

Abstract

var. capitata L.) quantification cultivated under different types of mulching, using aerial images captured by RPAS (Remotely Piloted Aircraft System).


Design/methodology/approach: The cabbage plantation used for the study was established under a completely randomized block design with different types of mulch as treatments: black plastic, white plastic, straw, and bare soil. Manual plant counts and automated estimates were performed using two agricultural artificial intelligence platforms (Platforms A and B). The relationship was evaluated using linear regression correlation (R²), and the following indicators were subsequently used: estimation accuracy (Ps), estimation error percentage (Es), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE).


Results: Platform A showed a correlation coefficient range of R²=0.41 to 0.91. Platform B obtained R² values ranging from 0.77 to 0.88. Platform A exhibited the highest estimation accuracy (Ps) with 98.3% and an estimation error (Es) of -1.7% for straw mulch, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.0% and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1 for bare soil. Both platforms showed underestimations in the number of detected plants, ranging from -6.7% to -1.7%.


Limitations on study/implications: The use of RPAS was limited by atmospheric conditions such as wind and rain.


Findings/conclusions: The effectiveness of counting cabbage plants using RPAS was validated.

Abstract 49 | EARLY ACCESS 7 (Español (España)) Downloads 0

Most read articles by the same author(s)